Bar Ass'n v. Canales

404 N.E.2d 750, 62 Ohio St. 2d 207, 16 Ohio Op. 3d 243, 1980 Ohio LEXIS 721
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided May 21, 1980·No. D.D. No. 80-7·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

“One of the fundamental tenets of the professional responsibility of a lawyer is that he should maintain a degree of personal and professional integrity that meets the highest standard. The integrity of the profession can be maintained only if the conduct of the individual attorney is above [209] reproach.***” Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Stein (1972), 29 Ohio St. 2d 77, 81.

Having reviewed the findings and recommendation of the board, it is found that respondent violated the above-cited provisions of the Code of Professional Responsibility.

It is the judgment of this court that respondent be indefinitely suspended from the practice of law.

Judgment accordingly.

Celebrezze, C. J., W. Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney, Locher and Holmes, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bar Ass'n v. Canales, 404 N.E.2d 750, 62 Ohio St. 2d 207, 16 Ohio Op. 3d 243, 1980 Ohio LEXIS 721 (Ohio 1980).

404 N.E.2d 750 (Bar Ass'n v. Canales) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Morton
450 N.E.2d 275 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1983)