Baptiste v. State

237 So. 3d 367
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 10, 2018·No. No. 4D16–185·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We affirm the denial of appellant's motion for postconviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850.

However, we remand for resentencing. In Baptiste v. State , 165 So.3d 746 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015), we held that appellant's convictions for home invasion robbery and burglary arising from a single criminal episode violated double jeopardy. On remand, the burglary conviction was vacated in February, 2016. The record does not reflect whether appellant was resentenced with a corrected scoresheet that does not include the burglary conviction. Appellant is entitled to be sentenced with a new scoresheet. See Fernandez v. State , 199 So.3d 500, 502 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016). We note that there is no record evidence that the court would have imposed the same sentence with a different scoresheet. Cf. Tundidor v. State , 221 So.3d 587, 605-07 (Fla. 2017).

Remanded for resentencing.

Gerber, C.J., Gross and May, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Baptiste v. State, 237 So. 3d 367 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

237 So. 3d 367 (Baptiste v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Nelson Baptiste v. State of Florida
165 So. 3d 746 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)
Fernandez v. State
199 So. 3d 500 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)
Randy W. Tundidor v. State of Florida
221 So. 3d 587 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2017)