Baptiste v. Haynes
233 A.D. 699
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 15, 1931
StatusPublished
This text of 233 A.D. 699 (Baptiste v. Haynes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Baptiste v. Haynes, 233 A.D. 699 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs, the court being of opinion that plaintiff’s story is incredible as a matter of law. Kapper, Carswell and Scudder, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., and Davis, J., dissent and vote to reverse upon the ground that there is a question of fact to be submitted to the jury.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
233 A.D. 699, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baptiste-v-haynes-nyappdiv-1931.