Baptist Hospital of Miami, Inc. v. Abaunza

563 So. 2d 174, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 4246, 1990 WL 78573
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 12, 1990
DocketNo. 90-334
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 563 So. 2d 174 (Baptist Hospital of Miami, Inc. v. Abaunza) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Baptist Hospital of Miami, Inc. v. Abaunza, 563 So. 2d 174, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 4246, 1990 WL 78573 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Baptist Hospital of Miami, Inc., appeals an order dismissing its action against Dr. Ramiro Abaunza and his professional association for contribution. We reverse.

In 1987 suit was brought against Baptist Hospital and Abaunza alleging professional negligence. A verdict was rendered jointly and severally against Abaunza and the hospital, and final judgment was entered thereon. The hospital paid the entire judgment and then filed a claim for contribution against Abaunza and his professional association pursuant to section 768.31, Florida Statutes (1989).

Insofar as pertinent here, Abaunza moved to dismiss for Baptist’s failure to comply with section 766.104, Florida Statutes (1989). The trial court granted the motion and dismissed the action with leave to refile after the expiration of ninety days. It appears that the trial court invoked section 766.106, Florida Statutes (1989), as well as section 766.104.

We agree with Baptist that the cited statutes are inapplicable where, as here, the parties to the contribution action have already been found liable for professional negligence. The statutory procedures are intended to be applied preliminary to a determination of liability. See Walt Disney World Co. v. Memorial Hospital, 363 So.2d 598 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978). Where there has been a determination of liability on the professional negligence claim, an action for contribution is not properly deemed to be within the statutory definition of sections 766.104 and 766.106.

We therefore reverse the dismissal of the action and remand for further proceedings consistent herewith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Walker v. Virginia Ins. Reciprocal
842 So. 2d 804 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2003)
Virginia Ins. Reciprocal v. Walker
765 So. 2d 229 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
563 So. 2d 174, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 4246, 1990 WL 78573, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baptist-hospital-of-miami-inc-v-abaunza-fladistctapp-1990.