Banyong v. Holder
This text of Banyong v. Holder (Banyong v. Holder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-1391
MAGDALINE IYABO BANYONG,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.
Submitted: November 22, 2010 Decided: December 9, 2010
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kim-Bun Thomas Li, LI, LATSEY & GUITERMAN, PLLC, Rockville, Maryland, for Petitioner. Tony West, Assistant Attorney General, Daniel E. Goldman, Senior Litigation Counsel, Jem C. Sponzo, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Magdaline Iyabo Banyong, a native and citizen of
Cameroon, petitions for review of an order of the Board of
Immigration Appeals (Board) denying her motion to reconsider.
We have reviewed the administrative record and find no abuse of
discretion in the denial of relief on Banyong’s motion. See 8
C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2010). We accordingly deny the petition for
review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Banyong
(B.I.A. Mar. 8, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Banyong v. Holder, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/banyong-v-holder-ca4-2010.