Bantz v. Frantz

12 F. 221
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bantz v. Frantz. Read the opinion of the Court — 105 U.S. 160
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided March 20, 1882·Published

Opinion

Mr. Justice Woods

delivering tho opinion of the court and affirming the judgment of the circuit court.

Where, under the original patent, suit could be maintained only against those who employed the combination embracing all the distinct contrivances described in Hie reissued patent, a reissue which claims each device separably is too broad, and consequently void. If any correction was desired it should have been applied for immediately — the right is abandoned and lost by unreasonable delay. Miller v. Bridgeport Brass Co. 3 Morr. Trans. 419, followed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bantz v. Frantz, 12 F. 221 (U.S. 1882).

12 F. 221 (Bantz v. Frantz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.