Bantum, J. v. U.S. Bank Nat.'l Assoc.
This text of Bantum, J. v. U.S. Bank Nat.'l Assoc. (Bantum, J. v. U.S. Bank Nat.'l Assoc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bantum, J. v. U.S. Bank Nat.'l Assoc., (Pa. 2016).
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
JEMILL BANTUM, : No. 71 EM 2016 : Petitioner : : : v. : : : U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, : ET AL., PHELAN HALLINAN, DIAMOND & : JONES, : : Respondents :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 20th day of June, 2016, the Application for Extraordinary and/or
King’s Bench Jurisdiction is DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
Bantum, J. v. U.S. Bank Nat.'l Assoc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bantum-j-v-us-bank-natl-assoc-pa-2016.