Banton v. Saunders

Fourth Circuit

Banton v. Saunders

41 F. App'x 684

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 25, 2002·No. No. 02-6857·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Maynard Banton, a Virginia inmate, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2001) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp.2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Banton v. Saunders, No. CA-02-338-2 (E.D.Va. May 23, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Maynard Banton, a Virginia inmate, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2001) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp.2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Banton v. Saunders, No. CA-02-338-2 (E.D.Va. May 23, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Banton v. Saunders, 41 F. App'x 684 (4th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

41 F. App'x 684 (Banton v. Saunders) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related