Banta v. Phillips Co.

622 So. 2d 173, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 8391, 1993 WL 303098
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 12, 1993
DocketNo. 91-3026
StatusPublished

This text of 622 So. 2d 173 (Banta v. Phillips Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Banta v. Phillips Co., 622 So. 2d 173, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 8391, 1993 WL 303098 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appealed order is affirmed, except insofar as the judge addressed the question of maximum medical improvement and the existence of any permanent impairment. It was not necessary for the judge to address these matters to resolve the claim, and they were not within the scope of the issues presented for adjudication. The judge thus should not have entered a ruling as to these matters. See e.g., Scott Smith Oldsmobile v. Hoffard, 415 So.2d 886 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); Central Oil v. Campen, 390 So.2d 191 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980). The maximum medical improvement and permanent impairment determinations are therefore stricken from the appealed order, and as amended the order is affirmed.

ZEHMER, C.J., and ALLEN and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Scott Smith Oldsmobile v. Hoffard
415 So. 2d 886 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
Central Oil Co. v. Campen
390 So. 2d 191 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
622 So. 2d 173, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 8391, 1993 WL 303098, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/banta-v-phillips-co-fladistctapp-1993.