Bansal v. Montgomery County

583 F. App'x 106
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 5, 2014·No. No. 13-2012·Published

Opinion

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Amar and Bina Bansal seek to appeal the district court’s order granting the motion to dismiss the claims against Montgomery County, Maryland, and Officer Thomas Berry in the Bansals’ 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (2012) action. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order the Bansals seek to appeal is neither a final order nor an ap-pealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bansal v. Montgomery County, 583 F. App'x 106 (4th Cir. 2014).

583 F. App'x 106 (Bansal v. Montgomery County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.
337 U.S. 541 (Supreme Court, 1949)