Banny v. Griepp

116 A.D.2d 547, 498 N.Y.S.2d 308, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51398

This text of 116 A.D.2d 547 (Banny v. Griepp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Banny v. Griepp, 116 A.D.2d 547, 498 N.Y.S.2d 308, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51398 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Opinion

In a medical malpractice action, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bellard, J.), dated January 23, 1985, which denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the first cause of action.

Order affirmed, with costs.

The affidavit of plaintiffs’ medical expert submitted in to the motion sets forth sufficient facts regarding alleged departure from accepted standards of medical practice to overcome the motion for summary judgment (CPLR 3212 [b]; cf. Wind v Cacho, 111 AD2d 808). Gibbons, J. P., Thompson, Brown and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wind v. Cacho
111 A.D.2d 808 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
116 A.D.2d 547, 498 N.Y.S.2d 308, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51398, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/banny-v-griepp-nyappdiv-1986.