Banny v. Griepp

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Banny v. Griepp

116 A.D.2d 547, 498 N.Y.S.2d 308, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51398

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 13, 1986·Published

Opinion

In a medical malpractice action, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bellard, J.), dated January 23, 1985, which denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the first cause of action.

Order affirmed, with costs.

The affidavit of plaintiffs’ medical expert submitted in to the motion sets forth sufficient facts regarding alleged departure from accepted standards of medical practice to overcome the motion for summary judgment (CPLR 3212 [b]; cf. Wind v Cacho, 111 AD2d 808). Gibbons, J. P., Thompson, Brown and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a medical malpractice action, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bellard, J.), dated January 23, 1985, which denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the first cause of action.

Order affirmed, with costs.

The affidavit of plaintiffs’ medical expert submitted in to the motion sets forth sufficient facts regarding alleged departure from accepted standards of medical practice to overcome the motion for summary judgment (CPLR 3212 [b]; cf. Wind v Cacho, 111 AD2d 808). Gibbons, J. P., Thompson, Brown and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Banny v. Griepp, 116 A.D.2d 547, 498 N.Y.S.2d 308, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51398 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

116 A.D.2d 547 (Banny v. Griepp) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related