Bannum, Inc. v. United States

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bannum, Inc. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 779 F.3d 1376
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided September 15, 2015·No. 15-5037·Unpublished

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

BANNUM, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

UNITED STATES, ALSTON WILKES SOCIETY, INC., Defendants-Appellees ______________________

2015-5037 ______________________

Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims in No. 1:14-cv-00822-MBH, Judge Marian Blank Horn. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

JUSTIN HUFFMAN, Camardo Law Firm, P.C., Auburn, NY, argued for appellant. Also represented by JOSEPH A. CAMARDO, JR.

JAMES R. SWEET, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washing- ton, DC, argued for appellee United States. Also repre- sented by ALLISON KIDD-MILLER, ROBERT E. KIRSCHMAN, JR., BENJAMIN C. MIZER. JAMES LYNN WERNER, Parker, Poe, Adams & Bern- stein, LLP, Columbia, SC, argued for appellee Alston Wilkes Society, Inc. Also represented by LAWRENCE HERSHON. ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, NEWMAN and CHEN, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

September 15, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bannum, Inc. v. United States, (Fed. Cir. 2015).

Bannum, Inc. v. United States (Bannum, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.