Bannum, Inc. v. Eugene Mees D/B/A Encore House
This text of Bannum, Inc. v. Eugene Mees D/B/A Encore House (Bannum, Inc. v. Eugene Mees D/B/A Encore House) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-010-00033-CV
Bannum, Inc., Appellant
v.
Eugene Mees d/b/a Encore House, Appellee
FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 419TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. D-1-GN-07-002493, HONORABLE LORA J. LIVINGSTON, JUDGE PRESIDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant Bannum, Inc. and appellee Eugene Mees d/b/a Encore House have filed
a joint motion to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction on the basis that the orders to be
appealed from are not final, appealable orders. We grant the parties’ motion and dismiss the appeal.
See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2).
J. Woodfin Jones, Chief Justice
Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Pemberton and Waldrop
Dismissed on Joint Motion
Filed: March 30, 2010
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bannum, Inc. v. Eugene Mees D/B/A Encore House, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bannum-inc-v-eugene-mees-dba-encore-house-texapp-2010.