Bannon v. Sullivan

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Bannon v. Sullivan

617 A.2d 406, 1992 R.I. LEXIS 265, 1992 WL 398036

CourtSupreme Court of Rhode Island

DecidedDecember 18, 1992

DocketNo. 92-198-Appeal

StatusPublished

This text of 617 A.2d 406 (Bannon v. Sullivan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bannon v. Sullivan, 617 A.2d 406, 1992 R.I. LEXIS 265, 1992 WL 398036 (R.I. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

This matter was before the Supreme Court on an order issued to all parties to appear and show cause why the issues raised in this appeal should not be summarily decided. The plaintiffs’ had appealed from a Superior Court denial from their motion for award of attorney’s fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1988.

After reviewing the memoranda submitted by the parties and after hearing their counsel in oral argument, it is the conclusion of this court that cause has not been shown. It is also the conclusion of this court that it was not clear that the instant suit precipitated the solution of the staff problems which gave rise to the bringing of the action. There is no basis on which the court could hold that the trial justice was clearly wrong in so holding.

Therefore, given the deference owed to a trial justice sitting without a jury, see Oster v. Tellier, 544 A.2d 128, 131 (R.I.1988), it is the conclusion of this court that plaintiffs’ appeal should be and is denied and dismissed, the order appealed from is affirmed and the papers of the case are remanded to the Superior Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

This matter was before the Supreme Court on an order issued to all parties to appear and show cause why the issues raised in this appeal should not be summarily decided. The plaintiffs’ had appealed from a Superior Court denial from their motion for award of attorney’s fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1988.

After reviewing the memoranda submitted by the parties and after hearing their counsel in oral argument, it is the conclusion of this court that cause has not been shown. It is also the conclusion of this court that it was not clear that the instant suit precipitated the solution of the staff problems which gave rise to the bringing of the action. There is no basis on which the court could hold that the trial justice was clearly wrong in so holding.

Therefore, given the deference owed to a trial justice sitting without a jury, see Oster v. Tellier, 544 A.2d 128, 131 (R.I.1988), it is the conclusion of this court that plaintiffs’ appeal should be and is denied and dismissed, the order appealed from is affirmed and the papers of the case are remanded to the Superior Court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

617 A.2d 406, 1992 R.I. LEXIS 265, 1992 WL 398036, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bannon-v-sullivan-ri-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack