Bannon v. Strickland Transit, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bannon v. Strickland Transit, Inc.

156 A.D.2d 530, 550 N.Y.S.2d 829, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15920

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 18, 1989

StatusPublished

This text of 156 A.D.2d 530 (Bannon v. Strickland Transit, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bannon v. Strickland Transit, Inc., 156 A.D.2d 530, 550 N.Y.S.2d 829, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15920 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Garry, J.), entered September 6, 1988, which, upon a jury verdict, is in favor of the defendants and against him.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Under the circumstances of this case, we find that the court’s ruling with respect to the admission of blood tests was correct and that it did not violate the doctrine of law of the case. We have examined the plaintiffs other contentions and find them to be without merit. Sullivan, J. P., Harwood, Balletta, and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Garry, J.), entered September 6, 1988, which, upon a jury verdict, is in favor of the defendants and against him.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Under the circumstances of this case, we find that the court’s ruling with respect to the admission of blood tests was correct and that it did not violate the doctrine of law of the case. We have examined the plaintiffs other contentions and find them to be without merit. Sullivan, J. P., Harwood, Balletta, and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

156 A.D.2d 530, 550 N.Y.S.2d 829, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15920, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bannon-v-strickland-transit-inc-nyappdiv-1989.