Bannister v. PULASKI FINANCIAL CORP.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Bannister v. PULASKI FINANCIAL CORP.

302 S.W.3d 248, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 60, 2010 WL 286628

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bannister v. PULASKI FINANCIAL CORP.. Read the opinion of the Court — 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 806 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 26, 2010·No. ED 92413·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff, Bonnie Bannister, appeals from the entry of summary judgment in favor of defendants, Pulaski Financial Corp. and *249 Pulaski Service Corp. No error of law appears. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff, Bonnie Bannister, appeals from the entry of summary judgment in favor of defendants, Pulaski Financial Corp. and *249 Pulaski Service Corp. No error of law appears. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Bannister v. PULASKI FINANCIAL CORP., 302 S.W.3d 248, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 60, 2010 WL 286628 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

302 S.W.3d 248 (Bannister v. PULASKI FINANCIAL CORP.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.