Bannister v. Michigan Mutual Life Insurance
119 A.D. 917
Opinion
Judgment and order reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event. Held, that the action was barred by the limitation contained in the contract of insurance. All concurred, except Spring, J., who dissented. .
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bannister v. Michigan Mutual Life Insurance, 119 A.D. 917 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1907).
119 A.D. 917 (Bannister v. Michigan Mutual Life Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.