Bannister v. Allen
1 Blackf. 414, 1825 Ind. LEXIS 50
This text of 1 Blackf. 414 (Bannister v. Allen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bannister v. Allen, 1 Blackf. 414, 1825 Ind. LEXIS 50 (Ind. 1825).
Opinion
It is the duty of the party obtaining an order [415]*415for a certiorari, to use due diligence in having the writ issued and delivered to the clerk of the Court below, and in having a complete record made out and transmitted to the clerk of this Court, Such diligence not appearing to have been used on the present occasion, the motion is refused.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
I. X. L. Lime Co. v. Superior Court
76 P. 973 (California Supreme Court, 1904)
Johnson v. Supervisors of Clayton County
61 Iowa 89 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1883)
Kesler v. Myers
41 Ind. 543 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1873)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 Blackf. 414, 1825 Ind. LEXIS 50, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bannister-v-allen-ind-1825.