Banning v. Lake Cty.
Opinion
[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 91 Ohio St.3d 206.]
BANNING ET AL., APPELLEES, v. LAKE COUNTY ET AL.; BASTER, APPELLANT.
[Cite as Banning v. Lake Cty., 2001-Ohio-262.]
Appellate procedure—Final order—Political subdivision tort liability—R.C. 2744.02(C)—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed on authority of Stevens v. Ackman.
(No. 00-1183—Submitted February 28, 2001—Decided March 28, 2001.) CERTIFIED by the Court of Appeals for Lake County, No. 99-L-113.
{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of Stevens v. Ackman (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 182, 743 N.E.2d 901. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur.
Weston, Hurd, Fallon, Paisley & Howley, L.L.P., Hilary S. Taylor and Gary A. Vick, Jr., for appellant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
2001 Ohio 262 (Banning v. Lake Cty.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.