Banning v. Lake Cty.

Ohio Supreme Court

Banning v. Lake Cty.

2001 Ohio 262, 91 Ohio St. 3d 206

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 27, 2001

Docket2000-1183

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 2001 Ohio 262 (Banning v. Lake Cty.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Banning v. Lake Cty., 2001 Ohio 262, 91 Ohio St. 3d 206 (Ohio 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 91 Ohio St.3d 206.]

BANNING ET AL., APPELLEES, v. LAKE COUNTY ET AL.; BASTER, APPELLANT. [Cite as Banning v. Lake Cty., 2001-Ohio-262.] Appellate procedure—Final order—Political subdivision tort liability—R.C. 2744.02(C)—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed on authority of Stevens v. Ackman. (No. 00-1183—Submitted February 28, 2001—Decided March 28, 2001.) CERTIFIED by the Court of Appeals for Lake County, No. 99-L-113. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of Stevens v. Ackman (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 182, 743 N.E.2d 901. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. __________________ Weston, Hurd, Fallon, Paisley & Howley, L.L.P., Hilary S. Taylor and Gary A. Vick, Jr., for appellant. __________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 91 Ohio St.3d 206.]

BANNING ET AL., APPELLEES, v. LAKE COUNTY ET AL.; BASTER, APPELLANT. [Cite as Banning v. Lake Cty., 2001-Ohio-262.] Appellate procedure—Final order—Political subdivision tort liability—R.C. 2744.02(C)—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed on authority of Stevens v. Ackman. (No. 00-1183—Submitted February 28, 2001—Decided March 28, 2001.) CERTIFIED by the Court of Appeals for Lake County, No. 99-L-113. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of Stevens v. Ackman (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 182, 743 N.E.2d 901. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. __________________ Weston, Hurd, Fallon, Paisley & Howley, L.L.P., Hilary S. Taylor and Gary A. Vick, Jr., for appellant. __________________

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2001 Ohio 262, 91 Ohio St. 3d 206, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/banning-v-lake-cty-ohio-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack