Bannerman v. State

287 So. 2d 402
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 8, 1974·No. No. Q-337·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks reversal of his judgment of conviction for manslaughter, which was entered pursuant to a plea of guilty. We previously relinquished jurisdiction of this cause (Fla.App., 283 So.2d 124) to the trial court for the purpose of reconstructing the proceedings surrounding the making and acceptance of appellant’s guilty plea.

We have now received and examined the reconstructed account of the proceedings below, as signed by the trial judge, the assistant state attorney and the assistant public defender, as well as a separate affidavit signed by a former assistant state attorney who handled the present case below. Upon our consideration thereof, it is our conclusion that no error was committed in the trial court. Accordingly, the judgment and sentence appealed herein is affirmed.

WIGGINTON, Acting C. J. (Retired), and JOHNSON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bannerman v. State, 287 So. 2d 402 (Fla. Ct. App. 1974).

287 So. 2d 402 (Bannerman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bannerman v. Wainwright
283 So. 2d 124 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1973)