Bannerman v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Bannerman v. State

287 So. 2d 402

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 8, 1974

DocketNo. Q-337

StatusPublished

This text of 287 So. 2d 402 (Bannerman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bannerman v. State, 287 So. 2d 402 (Fla. Ct. App. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks reversal of his judgment of conviction for manslaughter, which was entered pursuant to a plea of guilty. We previously relinquished jurisdiction of this cause (Fla.App., 283 So.2d 124) to the trial court for the purpose of reconstructing the proceedings surrounding the making and acceptance of appellant’s guilty plea.

We have now received and examined the reconstructed account of the proceedings below, as signed by the trial judge, the assistant state attorney and the assistant public defender, as well as a separate affidavit signed by a former assistant state attorney who handled the present case below. Upon our consideration thereof, it is our conclusion that no error was committed in the trial court. Accordingly, the judgment and sentence appealed herein is affirmed.

WIGGINTON, Acting C. J. (Retired), and JOHNSON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks reversal of his judgment of conviction for manslaughter, which was entered pursuant to a plea of guilty. We previously relinquished jurisdiction of this cause (Fla.App., 283 So.2d 124) to the trial court for the purpose of reconstructing the proceedings surrounding the making and acceptance of appellant’s guilty plea.

We have now received and examined the reconstructed account of the proceedings below, as signed by the trial judge, the assistant state attorney and the assistant public defender, as well as a separate affidavit signed by a former assistant state attorney who handled the present case below. Upon our consideration thereof, it is our conclusion that no error was committed in the trial court. Accordingly, the judgment and sentence appealed herein is affirmed.

WIGGINTON, Acting C. J. (Retired), and JOHNSON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

287 So. 2d 402, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bannerman-v-state-fladistctapp-1974.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack