Bannerman v. Potter

Fourth Circuit

Bannerman v. Potter

84 F. App'x 299

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 24, 2003·No. No. 02-2352·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Patricia A. Bannerman appeals the district court’s order dismissing her Title VII action in which she alleged gender discrimination claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Bannerman v. Potter, No. CA-01-108-2 (S.D.W.Va. Sept. 30, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Patricia A. Bannerman appeals the district court’s order dismissing her Title VII action in which she alleged gender discrimination claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Bannerman v. Potter, No. CA-01-108-2 (S.D.W.Va. Sept. 30, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Bannerman v. Potter, 84 F. App'x 299 (4th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

84 F. App'x 299 (Bannerman v. Potter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.