Banner Milling Co. v. State
210 A.D. 812
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 15, 1924·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Judgement amended by striking therefrom the 7th paragraph as not a proper part of the judgment and as so amended the judgment is affirmed, with costs against the claimant. The appeal of the State of New York is dismissed, without costs, on the ground that no appeal lies from a decision (Gilmore v. Ham, 61 Hun, 1; affd., 133 N. Y. 664; Spies v. Munroe, 35 App. Div. 527; Gabay v. Doane, 66 id. 507; Court of Claims Act, § 29), nor from a finding of fact (Reich v. Cochran, 196 App. Div. 248, 254). All concur; Hubbs, P. J., not sitting.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Banner Milling Co. v. State, 210 A.D. 812 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1924).
210 A.D. 812 (Banner Milling Co. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Smith v. People
9 A.D.2d 205 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1959)
Sowma v. State
203 Misc. 1105 (New York State Court of Claims, 1953)
In re City of New York
159 Misc. 741 (New York Supreme Court, 1936)