Banner Milling Co. v. State
This text of 210 A.D. 812 (Banner Milling Co. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgement amended by striking therefrom the 7th paragraph as not a proper part of the judgment and as so amended the judgment is affirmed, with costs against the claimant. The appeal of the State of New York is dismissed, without costs, on the ground that no appeal lies from a decision (Gilmore v. Ham, 61 Hun, 1; affd., 133 N. Y. 664; Spies v. Munroe, 35 App. Div. 527; Gabay v. Doane, 66 id. 507; Court of Claims Act, § 29), nor from a finding of fact (Reich v. Cochran, 196 App. Div. 248, 254). All concur; Hubbs, P. J., not sitting.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
210 A.D. 812, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/banner-milling-co-v-state-nyappdiv-1924.