Bankston v. City of Clarksdale

99 So. 266, 134 Miss. 721, 1924 Miss. LEXIS 296
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 10, 1924
DocketNo. 23960
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 99 So. 266 (Bankston v. City of Clarksdale) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bankston v. City of Clarksdale, 99 So. 266, 134 Miss. 721, 1924 Miss. LEXIS 296 (Mich. 1924).

Opinion

Ethridge, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The suggestion of diminution states that the stenographer failed to include in the record in this cause the true and correct notes taken at the trial, but that the stenographer by mistake transcribed the notes taken in another case in which the defendant was acquitted and discharged and from which no appeal was prosecuted. Neither the suggestion 'of diminution nor the affidavit in support thereof states that the notes of the stenographer in the proper case are on file in the clerk’s'office. This court has held several times that it had no jurisdiction over the stenographer to compel him to file his notes, and, there being no showing that such notes are on file for the clerk to certify here, the suggestion of diminution is overruled.

Suggestion of diminution overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brown v. City of Water Valley
319 So. 2d 649 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
99 So. 266, 134 Miss. 721, 1924 Miss. LEXIS 296, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bankston-v-city-of-clarksdale-miss-1924.