Bankston v. Barnesville Bank

121 S.E. 875, 31 Ga. App. 774, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 182
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMarch 6, 1924
Docket15198
StatusPublished

This text of 121 S.E. 875 (Bankston v. Barnesville Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bankston v. Barnesville Bank, 121 S.E. 875, 31 Ga. App. 774, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 182 (Ga. Ct. App. 1924).

Opinion

Luke, J.

1. A discharge in bankruptcy does not relieve the bankrupt from liability upon an action for fraud or for obtaining money by false pretenses or false representations. Brandt v. Element, 20 Ga. App. 664 (93 S. E. 664), and citations.

2. Eor no reason pointed out in the record did the court err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur. B. H. Manry, Herman M. Johnson, for plaintiff in error. Bolls & Barrett, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brandt v. Klement
93 S.E. 255 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
121 S.E. 875, 31 Ga. App. 774, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 182, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bankston-v-barnesville-bank-gactapp-1924.