Bankston v. Barnesville Bank

121 S.E. 875, 31 Ga. App. 774, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 182
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided March 6, 1924·No. 15198·Published

Opinion

Luke, J.

1. A discharge in bankruptcy does not relieve the bankrupt from liability upon an action for fraud or for obtaining money by false pretenses or false representations. Brandt v. Element, 20 Ga. App. 664 (93 S. E. 664), and citations.

2. Eor no reason pointed out in the record did the court err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur. B. H. Manry, Herman M. Johnson, for plaintiff in error. Bolls & Barrett, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bankston v. Barnesville Bank, 121 S.E. 875, 31 Ga. App. 774, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 182 (Ga. Ct. App. 1924).

121 S.E. 875 (Bankston v. Barnesville Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brandt v. Klement
93 S.E. 255 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)