Banks v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Opinion

1 || Artin Betpera (SBN 244477) Artin. Betpera@wbd-us.com 2|| WOMBLE BOND DICKINSON (US) LLP 400 Spectrum Center Drive, Suite 1700 31] Irvine, CA 92618 Telephone: (714) 557-3800 4|| Facsimile: (714) 557-3347 5 || Attorney for Defendant WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JEFFREY L BANKS, CASE NO. 4:20-CV-08745-HSG Plaintiff ORDER STAYING ACTION AND 12 ° CONTINUING DATES (AS MODIFIED) □□ 14 WELLS FARGO, N.A., 15 Defendant. 16 17 The Court has reviewed the parties’ Stipulation to Stay Action and Continue Dates, □□□ 18 || finds that good cause exists to order as follows: 19 1. This action is stayed until the Supreme Court issues its opinion in Duguid v || Facebook, Inc., 926 F.3d 1146 (9th Cir. 2019), cert. grantedin part, US. , □□□□ _ L.Ed.2d___, 2020 WL 3865252 (US. July 9, 2020) (No. 19-511) (“Duguid”); 22 2. The Court directs the parties to submit a joint status report within 48 hours of th 23 || Duguid decision. The status report should simply attach the decision with no legal or factua || argument or characterization. The Court shall set a case management conference upon receipt o that notice. |] // // 28 |] // -|-

1 3. Wells Fargo’s deadline to respond to Plaintiff's complaint is hereby extended to tw 2 || weeks following the parties’ submission of the notice of the Supreme Court’s issuance of its opiniot 3 || in Duguid. 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. §|| DATED: 3/2/2021 Ue, J § f lf ) 6 Honorable Haywood S, Gilliam, Jr 8 10 1] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28