Banks v. Watson

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Banks v. Watson

264 S.W.2d 679, 1954 Ky. LEXIS 692

CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky

DecidedFebruary 5, 1954

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 264 S.W.2d 679 (Banks v. Watson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Banks v. Watson, 264 S.W.2d 679, 1954 Ky. LEXIS 692 (Ky. Ct. App. 1954).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Motion for an appeal from the Perry Circuit Court. R. C. Littleton, Special Judge.

We are affirming the judgment for $500 in this case because we think (1) there was sufficient evidence to submit the case to the jury; (2) the verdict was not excessive; and (3) it was not error to refuse tp grant a continuance because of Witt’s absence at the trial.

The motion for an appeal is overruled and the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Motion for an appeal from the Perry Circuit Court. R. C. Littleton, Special Judge.

We are affirming the judgment for $500 in this case because we think (1) there was sufficient evidence to submit the case to the jury; (2) the verdict was not excessive; and (3) it was not error to refuse tp grant a continuance because of Witt’s absence at the trial.

The motion for an appeal is overruled and the judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

264 S.W.2d 679, 1954 Ky. LEXIS 692, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/banks-v-watson-kyctapp-1954.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack