Banks v. Watson
264 S.W.2d 679, 1954 Ky. LEXIS 692
Opinion
Motion for an appeal from the Perry Circuit Court. R. C. Littleton, Special Judge.
We are affirming the judgment for $500 in this case because we think (1) there was sufficient evidence to submit the case to the jury; (2) the verdict was not excessive; and (3) it was not error to refuse tp grant a continuance because of Witt’s absence at the trial.
The motion for an appeal is overruled and the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Banks v. Watson, 264 S.W.2d 679, 1954 Ky. LEXIS 692 (Ky. Ct. App. 1954).
264 S.W.2d 679 (Banks v. Watson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Stumbo & Vance Coal Co. v. Tackett
300 S.W.2d 232 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1957)