Banks v. United States Attorney

Fourth Circuit

Banks v. United States Attorney

333 F. App'x 734

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 14, 2009·No. No. 09-6096·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Frederick Hamilton Banks appeals the district court’s order denying his petition for writ of mandamus. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Banks v. United States Attorney, No. 5:08-hc-02117-BO (E.D.N.C. Dec. 31, 2008). Although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Frederick Hamilton Banks appeals the district court’s order denying his petition for writ of mandamus. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Banks v. United States Attorney, No. 5:08-hc-02117-BO (E.D.N.C. Dec. 31, 2008). Although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Banks v. United States Attorney, 333 F. App'x 734 (4th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

333 F. App'x 734 (Banks v. United States Attorney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.