Banks v. United States Attorney

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: October 14, 2009
• Docket: 09-6096
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6096

FREDERICK HAMILTON BANKS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY; COUNSELOR JACKSON; BRUCE PEARSON; HARLEY LAPPIN; LARRY RANDLE; CONSTANCE REESE; CHAPLAIN HOLSTEN; CHAPLAIN WILLIAMS; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER JOHNSON; JERRY BARBER, Correctional Officer; GERALD BRATCHER; MCCUTCHON; SOUTHERLAND; KATHERYN LAWSON, Doctor; CHRISTOPHER CURRY; MILDRED GREER; EDEN WHITE; COUNSELOR GRIFFEN; CAMERON LINDSEY; MARC RENDA; ART ROBERTS; JULIE NICKLIN; WALTER HARRIS; D. GREEN; DENISE BREWER; PATRICIA R. STANSBERRY; CHAPLAIN ZICKEFOOSE; CHAPLAIN ROBINSON,

Respondents – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:08-hc-02117-BO)

Submitted: August 20, 2009 Decided: October 14, 2009

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Frederick Hamilton Banks, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Frederick Hamilton Banks appeals the district court’s

order denying his petition for writ of mandamus. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

Banks v. United States Attorney, No. 5:08-hc-02117-BO (E.D.N.C.

Dec. 31, 2008). Although we grant leave to proceed in forma

pauperis, we dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED