Banks v. Union Planters Bank & Trust Co.

Second Circuit

Banks v. Union Planters Bank & Trust Co.

324 F.2d 499

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedNovember 8, 1963

DocketNo. 155, Docket 28413

StatusPublished

This text of 324 F.2d 499 (Banks v. Union Planters Bank & Trust Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Banks v. Union Planters Bank & Trust Co., 324 F.2d 499 (2d Cir. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks reversal of two orders of the lower court, the first granting the motion of certain defendants to dismiss appellant’s complaint as to them on the ground that that court did not have jurisdiction over the subject-matter of the litigation, and the second dismissing the action altogether for the same reason.

In open court we affirm the orders below. It conclusively appears that there is no federal question involved in this litigation and there is a lack of the required diversity of citizenship to give the federal courts jurisdiction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks reversal of two orders of the lower court, the first granting the motion of certain defendants to dismiss appellant’s complaint as to them on the ground that that court did not have jurisdiction over the subject-matter of the litigation, and the second dismissing the action altogether for the same reason.

In open court we affirm the orders below. It conclusively appears that there is no federal question involved in this litigation and there is a lack of the required diversity of citizenship to give the federal courts jurisdiction.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

324 F.2d 499, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/banks-v-union-planters-bank-trust-co-ca2-1963.