Banks v. Trans Union LLC

District Court, D. Nevada·Decided January 16, 2025·No. 2:21-cv-01580·Unknown

Opinion

1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 4]| Blanton Banks, II, Case No. 2:21-cv-01580-CDS-EJY 5 Plaintiff Order Closing Case v. 7|| Trans Union LLC, et al., 8 Defendants 9 10 This matter is currently on appeal with the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. ECF No. 235. However, because all of the underlying claims have been dismissed, the 12|| Clerk of Court is instructed to close this case.! B Dated: January 16, 2025 /, / 14 / yo / —— p Uni States District Judge 16 / 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 An order administratively closing a case is a docket management tool that has no jurisdictional effect. Dees v. Billy, 394 F.3d 1290, 1294 (9th Cir. 2005); See also Penn West Assocs., Inc. v. Cohen, 371 F.3d 118, 128 Gd 26]| Cir. 2004) (an order merely directing that a case be marked closed constitutes an administrative closing that has no legal consequence other than to remove that case from the district court’s active docket”).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Banks v. Trans Union LLC, (D. Nev. 2025).

Banks v. Trans Union LLC (Banks v. Trans Union LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related