Banks v. The Metropolis

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Banks v. The Metropolis

2 F. Cas. 762, 45 Hunt Mer. Mag. 590, 1861 U.S. App. LEXIS 393

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

DecidedNovember 8, 1861

StatusPublished

This text of 2 F. Cas. 762 (Banks v. The Metropolis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Banks v. The Metropolis, 2 F. Cas. 762, 45 Hunt Mer. Mag. 590, 1861 U.S. App. LEXIS 393 (circtsdny 1861).

Pincite

Opinion

NELSON, Circuit Justice.

The libel is filed in this case to recover damages against the Metropolis for a collision with the sloop Golden Rule, on the night of the 12th August, 1858, on Long Island sound, some five or six miles off Falkland’s Island, and nearly midway between that and the Long Island shore. The sloop was laden with corn and feed and bound for Providence, .Rhode Island. The Metropolis was on her usual trip from Fall fiver to the city of New York. The night was not very dark, the wind light, east southeast or southeast, the sloop going but one or two miles an hour, close hauled; she saw the lights of the steamer several miles off, and, when within some two or three miles, coming on a course apparently towards her, a bright light was hoisted by a hand standing on the deck; and after-wards, the steamer still continuing her course, he stood upon the top of the cabin, holding the light as high as he could with his arm.

The pilot of the Metropolis admits he saw a light of a vessel some two or three miles off on his port bow, but that it soon disappeared, and he did not again see it till the moment of the collision. No change was made in the course or speed of the vessel, which was sixteen miles an hour, after discerning the light; nor, for aught that appears, was there any attention paid to it The look-out admits he saw no light, nor did he report any till just as the collision happened. The better opinion, upon the proofs, is that, with a competent and vigilant lookout on the steamer, the sloop might have been seen even without a light, as the night was not very dark; but, with the light exhibited on the sloop, of which we cannot doubt, as all on board testify to it, there is no excuse for not having seen her in time to have avoided the disaster. We consider the case a very plain one of fault on the part of the steamer. As to the damages, we agree with the court below that the libellant was entitled to recover on the basis of a total loss. The injury to the vessel and cargo was so great,—and both submerged near the middle of the sound, which, at the place of collision, was some sixteen miles wide,—he was not under obligation to encounter the hazard and expense of attempting their rescue, or to save anything from the wreck. If the attempt had resulted in the increase of his loss, which it probably would, the respondents would not have been liable for it. Decree affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NELSON, Circuit Justice.

The libel is filed in this case to recover damages against the Metropolis for a collision with the sloop Golden Rule, on the night of the 12th August, 1858, on Long Island sound, some five or six miles off Falkland’s Island, and nearly midway between that and the Long Island shore. The sloop was laden with corn and feed and bound for Providence, .Rhode Island. The Metropolis was on her usual trip from Fall fiver to the city of New York. The night was not very dark, the wind light, east southeast or southeast, the sloop going but one or two miles an hour, close hauled; she saw the lights of the steamer several miles off, and, when within some two or three miles, coming on a course apparently towards her, a bright light was hoisted by a hand standing on the deck; and after-wards, the steamer still continuing her course, he stood upon the top of the cabin, holding the light as high as he could with his arm.

The pilot of the Metropolis admits he saw a light of a vessel some two or three miles off on his port bow, but that it soon disappeared, and he did not again see it till the moment of the collision. No change was made in the course or speed of the vessel, which was sixteen miles an hour, after discerning the light; nor, for aught that appears, was there any attention paid to it The look-out admits he saw no light, nor did he report any till just as the collision happened. The better opinion, upon the proofs, is that, with a competent and vigilant lookout on the steamer, the sloop might have been seen even without a light, as the night was not very dark; but, with the light exhibited on the sloop, of which we cannot doubt, as all on board testify to it, there is no excuse for not having seen her in time to have avoided the disaster. We consider the case a very plain one of fault on the part of the steamer. As to the damages, we agree with the court below that the libellant was entitled to recover on the basis of a total loss. The injury to the vessel and cargo was so great,—and both submerged near the middle of the sound, which, at the place of collision, was some sixteen miles wide,—he was not under obligation to encounter the hazard and expense of attempting their rescue, or to save anything from the wreck. If the attempt had resulted in the increase of his loss, which it probably would, the respondents would not have been liable for it. Decree affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 F. Cas. 762, 45 Hunt Mer. Mag. 590, 1861 U.S. App. LEXIS 393, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/banks-v-the-metropolis-circtsdny-1861.