Banks v. State

147 S.W.2d 491, 141 Tex. Crim. 54, 1941 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 57
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Banks v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 143 Tex. Crim. 61
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided February 5, 1941·No. No. 21411.·Published

Opinion

GRAVES, Judge.

The offense is possessing whisky in a dry area for the purpose of sale; punishment, thirty days confinement in the county jail.

Fred W. Winch testified that he was an inspector of the Texas Liquor Control Board, and that he bought one-half pint of whisky from appellant in Scurry County on the 24th of June, 1940, and paid him seventy-five cents therefor. It was shown by agreement that the county was a dry area. The appellant did not introduce any testimony.

The record contains no bills of exception.

The evidence is deemed sufficient to support the conviction.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Banks v. State, 147 S.W.2d 491, 141 Tex. Crim. 54, 1941 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 57 (Tex. 1941).

147 S.W.2d 491 (Banks v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.