Banks v. State

359 S.W.3d 563, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 249, 2012 WL 612462
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 28, 2012·No. WD 73180·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM:

Ozie Banks was convicted in 2005 of forcible rape and forcible sodomy, both committed in 1986. Banks was, however, improperly sentenced under the 2000 Missouri statutes and, on direct appeal, this court reversed and remanded with directions for resentencing pursuant to the sentencing statutes that existed at the time of his crimes. Upon remand, Banks was resentenced under the law as it existed at the time of his crime. He now appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri, denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief alleging ineffective assistance of resentencing counsel. Finding no error, we affirm in this per curiam order and have provided the parties a memorandum of law explaining our ruling. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Banks v. State, 359 S.W.3d 563, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 249, 2012 WL 612462 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

359 S.W.3d 563 (Banks v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hines v. State
359 S.W.3d 563 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2012)