Banks v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Banks v. State

851 S.W.2d 633, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 299, 1993 WL 50956

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 2, 1993·No. No. 62084·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Arthur Banks, appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. We have reviewed the briefs and arguments of the parties, the transcript and the legal file, and can find no error on the part of the motion court. In addition, we find that no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. Appellant’s appeal is, therefore, affirmed pursuant to rule 84.-16(b). The parties have been provided with a memorandum, solely for their own information, setting out the reasons for our decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Arthur Banks, appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. We have reviewed the briefs and arguments of the parties, the transcript and the legal file, and can find no error on the part of the motion court. In addition, we find that no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. Appellant’s appeal is, therefore, affirmed pursuant to rule 84.-16(b). The parties have been provided with a memorandum, solely for their own information, setting out the reasons for our decision.

Banks v. State, 851 S.W.2d 633, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 299, 1993 WL 50956 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

851 S.W.2d 633 (Banks v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.