Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Banks v. State

Banks v. State

129 S.E. 667, 34 Ga. App. 232, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 179
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Banks v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 30 Ga. App. 358 →
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided July 29, 1925·No. 16592·Published

Opinion

Broyles, 0. J.

The evidence, while wholly circumstantial, was sufficient to exclude every reasonable hypothesis save that of the defendant’s guilt. The overruling of the motion for a new trial was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Banks v. State, 129 S.E. 667, 34 Ga. App. 232, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 179 (Ga. Ct. App. 1925).

129 S.E. 667 (Banks v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.