Banks v. State
129 S.E. 667, 34 Ga. App. 232, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 179
This text of 129 S.E. 667 (Banks v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Banks v. State, 129 S.E. 667, 34 Ga. App. 232, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 179 (Ga. Ct. App. 1925).
Opinion
The evidence, while wholly circumstantial, was sufficient to exclude every reasonable hypothesis save that of the defendant’s guilt. The overruling of the motion for a new trial was not error.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
129 S.E. 667, 34 Ga. App. 232, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 179, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/banks-v-state-gactapp-1925.