Banks v. State
94 S.E. 625, 21 Ga. App. 505, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 669
This text of 94 S.E. 625 (Banks v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Banks v. State, 94 S.E. 625, 21 Ga. App. 505, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 669 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).
Opinion
The verdict of guilty was amply authorized by the evidence, and the grounds of the amendment to the motion for a new trial-are without substantial merit. The judgment of the court refusing to grant a new trial is
Affirmed,
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
94 S.E. 625, 21 Ga. App. 505, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 669, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/banks-v-state-gactapp-1917.