Banks v. State

114 So. 3d 1010, 2012 WL 3535850, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 13672
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 17, 2012·No. No. 5D12-1632·Published

Opinion

PALMER, J.

Bradford B. Banks, Jr. (defendant) appeals the trial court’s summary denial of [1011]*1011his motion for postconviction relief, filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We reverse in part and affirm in part.

As to ground 1 of the defendant’s motion, the trial court erred in concluding that the motion was untimely, because the motion was timely filed within two years of this court’s affirmance of the defendant’s sentence. See Banks v. State, 968 So.2d 576 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007). Accordingly, we reverse and remand for consideration of the merits of ground 1.

As to ground 2, we find no error in the trial court’s ruling.

As to ground 8, we reverse because the defendant should have been given an opportunity, pursuant to Spera v. State, 971 So.2d 754 (Fla.2007), to amend his claim regarding his habitual offender status.

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED.

TORPY and JACOBUS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Banks v. State, 114 So. 3d 1010, 2012 WL 3535850, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 13672 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

114 So. 3d 1010 (Banks v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Spera v. State
971 So. 2d 754 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2007)