Banks v. State
692 So. 2d 1008, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 4942, 1997 WL 228601
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Banks v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 691 So. 2d 490 →
Opinion
We reverse appellant’s habitual offender sentences in two cases, 94-727CF A02 and 93-13236CF A02, imposed upon his probation revocation. At the time of appellant’s original conviction and sentence in these cases, there was no determination of habitualization [1009]*1009made by the trial court nor does the record reflect knowledge by appellant at that time of the mandatory minimum sentence and loss of gain time. See State v. Blackwell, 661 So.2d 282 (Fla.1995).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Banks v. State, 692 So. 2d 1008, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 4942, 1997 WL 228601 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).
692 So. 2d 1008 (Banks v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Blackwell
661 So. 2d 282 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1995)