Banks v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Banks v. State

566 So. 2d 366, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 6703, 1990 WL 127344

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 6, 1990

DocketNo. 89-1536

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 566 So. 2d 366 (Banks v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Banks v. State, 566 So. 2d 366, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 6703, 1990 WL 127344 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The sentence imposed upon appellant is reversed, and we remand for resentencing in accordance with Washington v. State, 564 So.2d 168 (Fla. 5th DCA June 21, 1990). A departure sentence may not be imposed at resentencing. Pope v. State, 561 So.2d 554 (Fla.1990).

The maximum period of incarceration that may be imposed in case number 87-4283, including the one-cell bump-up for violation of probation, is 30 months. In case number 88-9627, the maximum period of incarceration that may be imposed for 3⅜ years, including the one-cell bump-up for committing the new offense while on probation for the old offense. The increased penalty for the new offense results from the “one scoresheet” concept of the sentencing guidelines. Peters v. State, 531 So.2d 121 (Fla.1988).

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

COBB, GOSHORN and PETERSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The sentence imposed upon appellant is reversed, and we remand for resentencing in accordance with Washington v. State, 564 So.2d 168 (Fla. 5th DCA June 21, 1990). A departure sentence may not be imposed at resentencing. Pope v. State, 561 So.2d 554 (Fla.1990).

The maximum period of incarceration that may be imposed in case number 87-4283, including the one-cell bump-up for violation of probation, is 30 months. In case number 88-9627, the maximum period of incarceration that may be imposed for 3⅜ years, including the one-cell bump-up for committing the new offense while on probation for the old offense. The increased penalty for the new offense results from the “one scoresheet” concept of the sentencing guidelines. Peters v. State, 531 So.2d 121 (Fla.1988).

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

COBB, GOSHORN and PETERSON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

566 So. 2d 366, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 6703, 1990 WL 127344, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/banks-v-state-fladistctapp-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack