Banks v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Banks v. State

65 So. 667, 11 Ala. App. 176, 1914 Ala. App. LEXIS 32

DecidedJune 16, 1914

StatusPublished

This text of 65 So. 667 (Banks v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Banks v. State, 65 So. 667, 11 Ala. App. 176, 1914 Ala. App. LEXIS 32 (Ala. Ct. App. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

WALKER, P. J.

It was permissible for the jury to find from the evidence as to the language used by the defendant to Mrs. Russell and the circumstances of its use that it was insulting, within the meaning of section 6217 of the Code. — Turney v. State, 168 Ala. 128, 52 South. 910; Carter v. State, 107 Ala. 146, 18 South. 232; Wiley v. State, 65 South. 204. It follows that the inquiry as to whether what the defendant said bad such an import was properly submitted to the jury, and that the charges requested by him were well refused.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WALKER, P. J.

It was permissible for the jury to find from the evidence as to the language used by the defendant to Mrs. Russell and the circumstances of its use that it was insulting, within the meaning of section 6217 of the Code. — Turney v. State, 168 Ala. 128, 52 South. 910; Carter v. State, 107 Ala. 146, 18 South. 232; Wiley v. State, 65 South. 204. It follows that the inquiry as to whether what the defendant said bad such an import was properly submitted to the jury, and that the charges requested by him were well refused.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

65 So. 667, 11 Ala. App. 176, 1914 Ala. App. LEXIS 32, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/banks-v-state-alactapp-1914.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack