Banks v. Stansberry
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-6572
FREDERICK HAMILTON BANKS,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
PATRICIA R. STANSBERRY, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever, III, District Judge. (5:07-hc-02023-D)
Submitted: July 19, 2007 Decided: July 25, 2007
Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed as modified by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Frederick Hamilton Banks, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Frederick Hamilton Banks, a federal prisoner, appeals
the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241
(2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court, but we modify the dismissal to reflect that it
is without prejudice. Banks v. Stansberry, No. 5:07-hc-02023-D
(E.D.N.C. Apr. 2, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Banks v. Stansberry (Banks v. Stansberry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.