Banks v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims·Decided July 1, 2025·No. 23-1074V·Unpublished

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 23-1074V

SOPHIA BANKS, Chief Special Master Corcoran

Petitioner, Filed: May 28, 2025 v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent.

Sean Frank Greenwood, Greenwood Law Firm, Houston, TX, for Petitioner.

Adam Nemeth Muffett, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1

On July 13, 2023, Sophia Banks filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the “Vaccine Act”). On January 9 and August 27, 2024, Petitioner filed amended petitions. Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) resulting from an influenza vaccine received on December 22, 2021. Second Amended Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On January 31, 2025, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding Petitioner entitled to compensation for SIRVA. On May 27, 2025, Respondent filed the attached joint stipulation,3 requesting that I issue a decision awarding $104,256.26 to Petitioner.

1 Because this Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action taken in this case, it must be made

publicly accessible and will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, and/or at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2018).

3 Usually, a proffer is filed by Respondent if the parties have reached an informal agreement regarding the

appropriate amount of compensation to be awarded after an entitlement determination. However, in a Stipulation at ¶ 8. I find the stipulation reasonable and adopt it as my decision awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein.

Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Stipulation, I award Petitioner a lump sum payment of $104,256.26, to be paid through an ACH deposit to Petitioner’s counsel’s IOLTA account for prompt disbursement to Petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under Section 15(a).

The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master

minority of cases, the parties may choose to file a joint stipulation instead, representing more of a compromise regarding the compensation to be awarded.

4 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice

renouncing the right to seek review.

2 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

) SOPHIA BANKS, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) No. 23-1074V V. ) Chief Special Master Corcoran ) ECF SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND ) HUMAN SERVlCES, ) ) Respondent. )

STIPULATION

The parties hereby stipulate to the following matters:

1. Sophia Banks, petitioner, fi led a petition for vaccine compensation under the National

Vaccine Tnjury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa- 10 to -34 (the "Vaccine

Program"). The petition seeks compensation for injuries allegedly related to petitioner's receipt

of an influenza ("flu") vaccine, which is a vaccine contained in the Vaccine Injury Table (the

"Table"), 42 C.F.R. § 100.3 (a).

2. Petitioner received the flu vaccine on December 22, 2021. 1

3. The vaccination was administered within the United States.

4. Petitioner sustained a left shoulder injury related to vaccination administration

1 On March 29, 202 1, petitioner received COVID-19 vaccine in her left arm. Vaccines against COVID-l 9 are not contained in the Vaccine Injury Table. See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-14 and 42 C.F.R.§ I 00J(a). Pursuant to the declaration issued by the Secretary of Health and Human Services under the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act (42 U.S.C. §§ 247d-6d, 247d-6e), claims for alleged injuries from COYlD-19 countermeasures, including vaccines, may be compensable under the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program ("CICP"). See 85 Fed. Reg. 15198, 15202 (March 17, 2020). ("SIRVA") within the time period set forth in the Table following receipt of the flu vaccine, and

experienced the residual effects of a SIRVA injury for more than six months.

5. There is not a preponderance of evidence demonstrating that petitioner's injury is due

to a factor unrelated to vaccination.

6. Petitioner represents that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action

for damages on petitioner's behalf as a result of petitioner' s condition.

7. Accordingly, petitioner is entitled to compensation under the terms of the Vaccine Act

for her SJRVA Table injury. Therefore, a decision should be entered awarding the compensation

described in paragraph 8 of this Stipulation.

8. As soon as practicable after an entry of judgment reflecting a decision consistent with

the terms of this Stipu lation, and after petitioner has filed an election to receive compensation

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-2 l(a)(l), the Secretary of Health and Human Services will issue

the following vaccine compensation payment:

A lump sum of $104,256.26 to be paid through an ACH deposit to petitioner's counsel's IOLTA account for prompt disbursement to petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-1 5(a).

9. As soon as practicable after the entry of judgment on entitlement in this case, and after

petitioner has filed both a proper and timely election to receive compensation pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 300aa-2 l(a)( l), and an appl ication, the parties will submit to further proceedings

before the special master to award reasonable attorneys' fees and costs incurred in proceeding

upon this petition.

l 0.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Banks v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (uscfc 2025).

Banks v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Banks v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 24
42 U.S.C. § 24
§ 247d-6d
42 U.S.C. § 247d-6d
§ 300aa
42 U.S.C. § 300aa
§ 300aa-
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-
§ 300aa-1
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-1
§ 300aa-10
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10
§ 300aa-14
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-14
§ 300aa-2
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-2
Purposes
44 U.S.C. § 3501
§ 300a
42 U.S.C. § 300a
§ 247d
42 U.S.C. § 247d