Banks v. North Carolina Department of Corrections
This text of 272 F. App'x 303 (Banks v. North Carolina Department of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Theodore M. Banks appeals the district court’s orders granting summary judg[304]*304ment to the Defendants in his civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Banks v. North Carolina Dep’t of Corr., No. 5:03-ev-00772-BO (E.D.N.C. Mar. 30, 2006) & 2007 WL 2406866 (Aug. 20, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
272 F. App'x 303, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/banks-v-north-carolina-department-of-corrections-ca4-2008.