Banks v. National Union Insurance

304 A.D.2d 573, 756 N.Y.S.2d 890
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 7, 2003·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to Workers’ Compensation Law § 29 (5) to approve the settlement of an action nunc pro tunc, the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Dillon, J.), dated September 24, 2002, which granted the petition.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Proceedings pursuant to Workers’ Compensation Law § 29 (5) are directed to the discretion of the court (see Hargrove v Becom Real, 287 AD2d 598 [2001]; Matter of Gilson v National Union Fire Ins. Co., 246 AD2d 897 [1998]; Severino v Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 238 AD2d 837, 838 [1997]). The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in approving the petitioner’s [574] settlement with a third party nunc pro tunc (see DeRosa v Petrylak, 290 AD2d 596 [2002]). Altman, J.P., Goldstein, Luciano and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Banks v. National Union Insurance, 304 A.D.2d 573, 756 N.Y.S.2d 890 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

304 A.D.2d 573 (Banks v. National Union Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Williams v. Orange & Sullivan Excavating Corp.
114 A.D.3d 802 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
Shumski v. Loya
55 A.D.3d 716 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Buck v. Graphic Arts Mutual Insurance
19 A.D.3d 966 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Reynar v. Village of Sloatsburg
17 A.D.3d 601 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Furtado v. Mario's Bakery
17 A.D.3d 527 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Singh v. Ross
12 A.D.3d 498 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Zamfino v. Furman
1 A.D.2d 591 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)