Banks v. National Accident & Health Insurance

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Banks v. National Accident & Health Insurance

168 S.E. 515, 204 N.C. 782, 1933 N.C. LEXIS 278

DecidedMarch 22, 1933

StatusPublished

This text of 168 S.E. 515 (Banks v. National Accident & Health Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Banks v. National Accident & Health Insurance, 168 S.E. 515, 204 N.C. 782, 1933 N.C. LEXIS 278 (N.C. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Cubiam.

On controverted issues of fact, the jury has responded in favor of the plaintiff. The case seems to have been tried in substantial conformity to the apposite decisions on the subject and agreeably to the principles of law applicable. We have discovered no ruling or action on the part of the trial court which we apprehend should be held for reversible error. Hence, the verdict and judgment will be upheld.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Cubiam.

On controverted issues of fact, the jury has responded in favor of the plaintiff. The case seems to have been tried in substantial conformity to the apposite decisions on the subject and agreeably to the principles of law applicable. We have discovered no ruling or action on the part of the trial court which we apprehend should be held for reversible error. Hence, the verdict and judgment will be upheld.

No error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

168 S.E. 515, 204 N.C. 782, 1933 N.C. LEXIS 278, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/banks-v-national-accident-health-insurance-nc-1933.