Banks v. National Accident & Health Insurance
168 S.E. 515, 204 N.C. 782, 1933 N.C. LEXIS 278
Opinion
On controverted issues of fact, the jury has responded in favor of the plaintiff. The case seems to have been tried in substantial conformity to the apposite decisions on the subject and agreeably to the principles of law applicable. We have discovered no ruling or action on the part of the trial court which we apprehend should be held for reversible error. Hence, the verdict and judgment will be upheld.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Banks v. National Accident & Health Insurance, 168 S.E. 515, 204 N.C. 782, 1933 N.C. LEXIS 278 (N.C. 1933).
168 S.E. 515 (Banks v. National Accident & Health Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.