Banks v. McHugh

Fourth Circuit

Banks v. McHugh

561 F. App'x 259

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMarch 20, 2014

DocketNo. 13-2188

StatusPublished

This text of 561 F. App'x 259 (Banks v. McHugh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Banks v. McHugh, 561 F. App'x 259 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Pensicola Banks appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting the Defendant summary judgment in Banks’s civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Banks v. McHugh, No. 3:12-cv-00032-JFA, 2013 WL 4511597 (D.S.C. Aug. 23, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Pensicola Banks appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting the Defendant summary judgment in Banks’s civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Banks v. McHugh, No. 3:12-cv-00032-JFA, 2013 WL 4511597 (D.S.C. Aug. 23, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

561 F. App'x 259, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/banks-v-mchugh-ca4-2014.