Banks v. Lombardo
Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
JAMES VINCENT BANKS, Case No. 2:20-cv-00556-MMD-NJK 9 Plaintiff(s), iol v. ORDER 11! JOSEPH LOMBARDO, et al., 12 Defendant(s). 13 Plaintiff has failed to update his address. See Docket No. 97 (mail returned as undeliverable). “A party, not the district court, bears the burden of keeping the court apprised of 15] any changes in his mailing address.” Carey v. King, 856 F.2d 1439, 1441 (9th Cir. 1988); see also 16] Jn re Hammer, 940 F.2d 524, 526 (9th Cir. 1991). To that end, the local rules require that litigants 17] immediately file with the Court written notification of any change of address, and expressly warn 18] that failure to do so may result in case-dispositive sanctions. See Local Rule IA 3-1. 19 Accordingly, Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to file a notice of changed address by 20|| November 22, 2022. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER MAY RESULT IN 21] DISMISSAL OF THIS CASE. 23 Dated: October 25, 2022 Lf Nancy J. Koppe 25 United States Magistrate Judge 26 27 28
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Banks v. Lombardo (Banks v. Lombardo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.