Banks v. Larkin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Banks v. Larkin

39 A.D.2d 951, 333 N.Y.S.2d 1008, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4317

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 13, 1972

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 39 A.D.2d 951 (Banks v. Larkin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Banks v. Larkin, 39 A.D.2d 951, 333 N.Y.S.2d 1008, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4317 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding to validate petitions designating petitioner as a candidate in the Democratic Party Primary Election to be held on June 20, 1972 for public office of State Senator for the 23rd Senatorial District, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered June 13, 1972, which, inter alia, granted the application. Judgment affirmed, without costs. In view of counsel’s participation in the litigation on the merits, despite his professed special appearance to contest the jurisdiction of the court, it is our opinion that he waived any alleged defect in the service by registered mail upon appellant. Munder, Acting, P. J., Latham, Gulotta and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding to validate petitions designating petitioner as a candidate in the Democratic Party Primary Election to be held on June 20, 1972 for public office of State Senator for the 23rd Senatorial District, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered June 13, 1972, which, inter alia, granted the application. Judgment affirmed, without costs. In view of counsel’s participation in the litigation on the merits, despite his professed special appearance to contest the jurisdiction of the court, it is our opinion that he waived any alleged defect in the service by registered mail upon appellant. Munder, Acting, P. J., Latham, Gulotta and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

39 A.D.2d 951, 333 N.Y.S.2d 1008, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4317, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/banks-v-larkin-nyappdiv-1972.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack