Banks v. Gal
This text of Banks v. Gal (Banks v. Gal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-6806
LEWIS BANKS,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
STEVEN J. GAL, Warden; FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge. (CA-01-2543-23BD)
Submitted: September 5, 2002 Decided: September 10, 2002
Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lewis Banks, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Lewis Banks appeals the district court’s order denying relief
on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed the
record and the district court’s opinion accepting the
recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. See Banks v. Gal, No. CA-01-2543-23BD (D.S.C. filed May 2,
2002, entered May 3, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Banks v. Gal, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/banks-v-gal-ca4-2002.