Banks v. District of Columbia
This text of Banks v. District of Columbia (Banks v. District of Columbia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _______________________________________ ) Shawn Banks o/b/o D.B., a minor, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 09-990 (RBW) ) District of Columbia, ) ) Defendant. ) ) _______________________________________)
ORDER
For the reasons that are set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby
ORDERED that the plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment DENIED without
prejudice. It is further
ORDERED that the defendant's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED
without prejudice. It is further
ORDERED that this case is remanded to the administrative hearing officer to make a
determination as to whether the School System’s failure to provide all of the services in D.B.’s
Individualized Education Program constituted a denial of a free appropriate public education,
and to articulate the reasons for his determination within sixty (60) days of the issuance of this
Order. If the hearing officer finds that a violation occurred, he must determine what constitutes
an appropriate compensatory education award for D.B.
SO ORDERED this 6th day of July, 2010.
_____/s/________________ Reggie B. Walton United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Banks v. District of Columbia, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/banks-v-district-of-columbia-dcd-2010.