Banks v. Corber

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Banks v. Corber

262 S.W.2d 198

Court of Appeals of Kentucky·Decided November 6, 1953·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Motion for an appeal from the Perry Circuit Court. R. C. Littleton, Special Judge.

We are affirming the judgment for $500 in this case because we think (1) there was sufficient evidence to submit the case to the jury; (2) the verdict was not excessive; and (3) the jury was not acquainted with the verdict of the jury on the former trial of the case.

Judgment affirmed.

DUNCAN, J., did not sit in this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Motion for an appeal from the Perry Circuit Court. R. C. Littleton, Special Judge.

We are affirming the judgment for $500 in this case because we think (1) there was sufficient evidence to submit the case to the jury; (2) the verdict was not excessive; and (3) the jury was not acquainted with the verdict of the jury on the former trial of the case.

Judgment affirmed.

DUNCAN, J., did not sit in this case.

Banks v. Corber, 262 S.W.2d 198 (Ky. Ct. App. 1953).

Pincite

262 S.W.2d 198 (Banks v. Corber) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.